Quickwit vs Weaviate
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
VS
Weaviate
Open-source vector database for semantic and AI search
| Feature | Quickwit | Weaviate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,471 | ★ 16,704 |
| First released | 2021 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Splunk, Elasticsearch | Pinecone, Algolia |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Quickwit or Weaviate better?
Neither is universally better. Weaviate has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Quickwit and Weaviate free and open-source?
Yes. Quickwit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Weaviate under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Quickwit and Weaviate with Docker?
Quickwit: yes. Weaviate: yes.