Quickwit vs Vald
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
VS
Vald
Cloud-native distributed vector search engine
| Feature | Quickwit | Vald |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | kubernetes, helm, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,471 | ★ 1,716 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Splunk, Elasticsearch | Pinecone, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Choose Vald if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Quickwit or Vald better?
Quickwit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Vald if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Quickwit and Vald free and open-source?
Yes. Quickwit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Vald under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Quickwit and Vald with Docker?
Quickwit: yes. Vald: yes.