Quickwit vs Tantivy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
VS
Tantivy
Full-text search engine library written in Rust
| Feature | Quickwit | Tantivy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | source, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,471 | ★ 15,656 |
| First released | 2021 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Splunk, Elasticsearch | Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Quickwit or Tantivy better?
Neither is universally better. Tantivy has the larger community, while Quickwit is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Quickwit and Tantivy free and open-source?
Yes. Quickwit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tantivy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Quickwit and Tantivy with Docker?
Quickwit: yes. Tantivy: check the project docs for container support.