Quickwit vs Sonic
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
VS
Sonic
Fast, lightweight schema-less search backend
| Feature | Quickwit | Sonic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,471 | ★ 21,299 |
| First released | 2021 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Splunk, Elasticsearch | Algolia, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Quickwit or Sonic better?
Neither is universally better. Sonic has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Quickwit and Sonic free and open-source?
Yes. Quickwit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Sonic under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Quickwit and Sonic with Docker?
Quickwit: yes. Sonic: yes.