Quickwit vs RediSearch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
VS
RediSearch
Full-text and vector search module for Redis
| Feature | Quickwit | RediSearch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | RSALv2 |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,471 | ★ 6,205 |
| First released | 2021 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Splunk, Elasticsearch | Elasticsearch, Algolia |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Quickwit or RediSearch better?
Neither is universally better. Quickwit has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Quickwit and RediSearch free and open-source?
Yes. Quickwit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and RediSearch under RSALv2. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Quickwit and RediSearch with Docker?
Quickwit: yes. RediSearch: yes.