Qui vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureQuiSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM50 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 4,328★ 29,105
First released20262025
ReplacesµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Qui if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Qui details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Qui or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Qui and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Qui is licensed under GPL-2.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Qui and SRS with Docker?

Qui: check the project docs for container support. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons