Jellyfin vs Qui

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJellyfinQui
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-2.0
LanguageC#Go
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 55,528★ 4,328
First released20182026
ReplacesPlex, EmbyµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Jellyfin if…

  • No subscription or account needed
  • Active community development
  • Wide client support
Jellyfin details

Choose Qui if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Qui details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or Qui better?

Jellyfin is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Qui if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Jellyfin and Qui free and open-source?

Yes. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Qui under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jellyfin and Qui with Docker?

Jellyfin: yes. Qui: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons