QST vs Trilium Notes
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
QST
Online assessment software
VS
Trilium Notes
Hierarchical note-taking for building knowledge bases
| Feature | QST | Trilium Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Perl | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 37,298 |
| First released | 2020 | 2017 |
| Replaces | — | Evernote, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose QST if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in Perl
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Trilium Notes if…
- Powerful for big knowledge bases
- Flexible structure
- Scriptable
Frequently asked questions
Is QST or Trilium Notes better?
Trilium Notes is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider QST if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are QST and Trilium Notes free and open-source?
Yes. QST is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Trilium Notes under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run QST and Trilium Notes with Docker?
QST: check the project docs for container support. Trilium Notes: yes.