Joplin vs QST

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJoplinQST
CategoryNotes & Knowledge BaseNotes & Knowledge Base
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptPerl
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 55,856
First released20172020
ReplacesEvernote, OneNote

Why pick each one

Choose Joplin if…

  • Strong privacy with E2EE
  • Flexible sync options
  • Active development
Joplin details

Choose QST if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in Perl
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
QST details

Frequently asked questions

Is Joplin or QST better?

Joplin is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider QST if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Joplin and QST free and open-source?

Yes. Joplin is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and QST under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Joplin and QST with Docker?

Joplin: yes. QST: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons