Puter vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 87,439
First released20262014
ReplacesDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Syncthing better?

Syncthing is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Puter if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Puter and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Syncthing with Docker?

Puter: yes. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons