Pterodactyl vs PufferPanel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Pterodactyl | PufferPanel |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 91 · Excellent | 85 · Excellent |
| Category | Game Servers | Game Servers |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,253 | ★ 1,748 |
| First released | 2015 | 2015 |
| Replaces | TCAdmin, Multicraft | AMP, Multicraft |
What are Pterodactyl and PufferPanel?
Pterodactyl
Pterodactyl is a free, open-source game server management panel. It runs game servers in isolated Docker containers and provides a secure, multi-user web interface to manage them.
- Docker-isolated game servers
- Multi-user with permissions
- Supports dozens of games
- Resource limits and quotas
PufferPanel
Pufferpanel is a free, open-source game server management panel that provides a web interface to install, configure, and control dedicated game servers. It supports a wide range of games through its template system.
- Web-based game server panel
- Multi-game template support
- User and subuser permissions
- OAuth login
Pterodactyl vs PufferPanel: key differences
Pterodactyl is written in PHP, while PufferPanel is built with Go. Licensing differs — MIT for Pterodactyl versus Apache-2.0 for PufferPanel. PufferPanel is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 2,048 MB for Pterodactyl. Pterodactyl has the considerably larger community, at 9,253 GitHub stars versus 1,748.
Why pick each one
Choose Pterodactyl if…
- Secure container isolation
- Huge supported game library
Watch out for
- Complex initial setup
- Requires daemon plus panel
Choose PufferPanel if…
- Lightweight panel
- Supports many games
Watch out for
- Smaller than Pterodactyl ecosystem
- Templates need tuning
Frequently asked questions
Is Pterodactyl or PufferPanel better?
Neither is universally better. Pterodactyl has the larger community, while PufferPanel is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Pterodactyl and PufferPanel free and open-source?
Yes. Pterodactyl is licensed under MIT and PufferPanel under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Pterodactyl and PufferPanel with Docker?
Pterodactyl: yes. PufferPanel: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Pterodactyl or PufferPanel?
PufferPanel has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 2,048 MB for Pterodactyl. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.