Filebin vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFilebinSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 274★ 33,952
First released20142015
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox SendAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Filebin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
Filebin details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Filebin or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Filebin is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Filebin and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Filebin is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Filebin and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Filebin: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons