Filebin vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFilebinPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 274★ 43,003
First released20142026
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose Filebin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
Filebin details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Filebin or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Filebin is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Filebin and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Filebin is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Filebin and Puter with Docker?

Filebin: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons