Proxmox VE Exporter vs Apache SkyWalking
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Proxmox VE Exporter
Prometheus exporter for Proxmox Virtual Environment
VS
Apache SkyWalking
APM and observability for cloud-native architectures
| Feature | Proxmox VE Exporter | Apache SkyWalking |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,429 | ★ 24,915 |
| First released | 2017 | 2015 |
| Replaces | vRealize Operations | New Relic, Datadog |
Why pick each one
Choose Proxmox VE Exporter if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Choose Apache SkyWalking if…
- Full observability suite
- Strong Apache governance
Frequently asked questions
Is Proxmox VE Exporter or Apache SkyWalking better?
Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Proxmox VE Exporter is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Proxmox VE Exporter and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?
Yes. Proxmox VE Exporter is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Proxmox VE Exporter and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?
Proxmox VE Exporter: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.