ShareDrop vs SFTPGo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ShareDrop
Peer-to-peer file transfer in the browser
VS
SFTPGo
Full-featured SFTP, FTP and WebDAV server
| Feature | ShareDrop | SFTPGo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,747 | ★ 12,371 |
| First released | 2014 | 2019 |
| Replaces | AirDrop, WeTransfer | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose ShareDrop if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.7k GitHub stars
Choose SFTPGo if…
- Multi-protocol in one binary
- Flexible storage backends
- Strong access controls
Frequently asked questions
Is ShareDrop or SFTPGo better?
Neither is universally better. SFTPGo has the larger community, while ShareDrop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ShareDrop and SFTPGo free and open-source?
Yes. ShareDrop is licensed under MIT and SFTPGo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ShareDrop and SFTPGo with Docker?
ShareDrop: yes. SFTPGo: yes.