Encrypted Pastebin vs paste
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Encrypted Pastebin
Zero-knowledge encrypted text and code sharing
VS
paste
Minimalist self-hosted pastebin written in Go
| Feature | Encrypted Pastebin | paste |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | Zlib | MIT |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 83 | ★ 578 |
| First released | 2016 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist |
Why pick each one
Choose Encrypted Pastebin if…
- Released under the Zlib license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Encrypted Pastebin or paste better?
Neither is universally better. paste has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Encrypted Pastebin and paste free and open-source?
Yes. Encrypted Pastebin is licensed under Zlib and paste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Encrypted Pastebin and paste with Docker?
Encrypted Pastebin: yes. paste: yes.