fiche vs paste
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fiche
Terminal pastebin server powered by netcat
VS
paste
Minimalist self-hosted pastebin written in Go
| Feature | fiche | paste |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | C | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,547 | ★ 578 |
| First released | 2015 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com, termbin | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist |
Why pick each one
Choose fiche if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is fiche or paste better?
Neither is universally better. fiche has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are fiche and paste free and open-source?
Yes. fiche is licensed under MIT and paste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fiche and paste with Docker?
fiche: check the project docs for container support. paste: yes.