Posting vs Restfox
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Posting
Powerful HTTP client that lives in your terminal
VS
Restfox
Offline-first browser and desktop REST API client
| Feature | Posting | Restfox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,238 | ★ 2,739 |
| First released | 2024 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Postman, Insomnia | Postman, Insomnia |
Why pick each one
Choose Posting if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 12.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Choose Restfox if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Posting or Restfox better?
Neither is universally better. Posting has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Posting and Restfox free and open-source?
Yes. Posting is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Restfox under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Posting and Restfox with Docker?
Posting: check the project docs for container support. Restfox: yes.