Poole vs Soupault
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Poole
Minimalist static website generator in a single file
VS
Soupault
HTML-centric static website generator and processor
| Feature | Poole | Soupault |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | OCaml |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | source, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 31 | ★ 430 |
| First released | 2009 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Jekyll | Jekyll, Hugo |
Why pick each one
Choose Poole if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Soupault if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in OCaml
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Poole or Soupault better?
Neither is universally better. Soupault has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Poole and Soupault free and open-source?
Yes. Poole is licensed under MIT and Soupault under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Poole and Soupault with Docker?
Poole: check the project docs for container support. Soupault: check the project docs for container support.