Plik vs Filebin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Plik
Temporary file upload system (Wetransfer like)
VS
Filebin
Quick file sharing with auto-expiring bins
| Feature | Plik | Filebin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,810 | ★ 274 |
| First released | 2026 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer, Firefox Send |
Why pick each one
Choose Plik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Filebin if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Plik or Filebin better?
Neither is universally better. Plik has the larger community, while Filebin is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Plik and Filebin free and open-source?
Yes. Plik is licensed under MIT and Filebin under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Plik and Filebin with Docker?
Plik: check the project docs for container support. Filebin: yes.