Pi-hole vs Tor Snowflake Proxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePi-holeTor Snowflake Proxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseEUPL-1.2free
LanguageShell
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 60,247
First released20262022
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Pi-hole if…

  • Released under the EUPL-1.2 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 60.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
Pi-hole details

Choose Tor Snowflake Proxy if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Tor Snowflake Proxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Pi-hole or Tor Snowflake Proxy better?

Neither is universally better. Pi-hole has the larger community, while Tor Snowflake Proxy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Pi-hole and Tor Snowflake Proxy free and open-source?

Yes. Pi-hole is licensed under EUPL-1.2 and Tor Snowflake Proxy under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Pi-hole and Tor Snowflake Proxy with Docker?

Pi-hole: yes. Tor Snowflake Proxy: yes.

Related comparisons