PHP-FPM Exporter vs Apache SkyWalking
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
PHP-FPM Exporter
Prometheus exporter for PHP-FPM process pool metrics
VS
Apache SkyWalking
APM and observability for cloud-native architectures
| Feature | PHP-FPM Exporter | Apache SkyWalking |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, kubernetes | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 719 | ★ 24,915 |
| First released | 2017 | 2015 |
| Replaces | New Relic PHP, Datadog APM | New Relic, Datadog |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache SkyWalking if…
- Full observability suite
- Strong Apache governance
Frequently asked questions
Is PHP-FPM Exporter or Apache SkyWalking better?
Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while PHP-FPM Exporter is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are PHP-FPM Exporter and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?
Yes. PHP-FPM Exporter is licensed under MIT and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run PHP-FPM Exporter and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?
PHP-FPM Exporter: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.