Photoview vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePhotoviewSeaweedFS
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 6,496★ 33,952
First released20192015
ReplacesGoogle PhotosAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Photoview if…

  • Uses your folder structure
  • Lightweight
  • Easy setup
Photoview details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Photoview or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Photoview is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Photoview and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Photoview is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Photoview and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Photoview: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons