Phile vs Tina CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Phile
Flat-file CMS with a modular plugin architecture
VS
Tina CMS
Git-backed content management with visual editing
| Feature | Phile | Tina CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 255 | ★ 13,714 |
| First released | 2014 | 2021 |
| Replaces | WordPress | Contentful, Sanity |
Why pick each one
Choose Phile if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Tina CMS if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 13.7k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Phile or Tina CMS better?
Neither is universally better. Tina CMS has the larger community, while Phile is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Phile and Tina CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Phile is licensed under MIT and Tina CMS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Phile and Tina CMS with Docker?
Phile: check the project docs for container support. Tina CMS: yes.