Phabricator vs Rukovoditel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Phabricator
Suite of web apps to build software faster
VS
Rukovoditel
Web-based project management and CRM builder
| Feature | Phabricator | Rukovoditel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,299 | ★ 29 |
| First released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Replaces | GitHub, Jira | Jira, Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose Phabricator if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 12.3k GitHub stars
- Written in PHP
Choose Rukovoditel if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Phabricator or Rukovoditel better?
Neither is universally better. Phabricator has the larger community, while Rukovoditel is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Phabricator and Rukovoditel free and open-source?
Yes. Phabricator is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Rukovoditel under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Phabricator and Rukovoditel with Docker?
Phabricator: check the project docs for container support. Rukovoditel: check the project docs for container support.