pgBackRest vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturepgBackRestPuter
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageCTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 4,296★ 43,003
First released20132026
ReplacesVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose pgBackRest if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
pgBackRest details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is pgBackRest or Puter better?

Puter is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider pgBackRest if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are pgBackRest and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. pgBackRest is licensed under MIT and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run pgBackRest and Puter with Docker?

pgBackRest: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons