PeerTube vs Yamtrack

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeYamtrack
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0-or-later
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB200 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,236★ 3,306
First released20182026
ReplacesYouTube, VimeoGoodreads, IMDB, MyAnimeList

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose Yamtrack if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 200 MB RAM
Yamtrack details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or Yamtrack better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Yamtrack is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and Yamtrack free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Yamtrack under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and Yamtrack with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. Yamtrack: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons