PeerTube vs Wizarr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeWizarr
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0free
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 15,236★ 3,152
First released20182022
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose Wizarr if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
Wizarr details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or Wizarr better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Wizarr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and Wizarr free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Wizarr under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and Wizarr with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. Wizarr: yes.

Related comparisons