PeerTube vs VideoLAN Client (VLC)

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeVideoLAN Client (VLC)
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptC
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,236
First released20182020
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose VideoLAN Client (VLC) if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
VideoLAN Client (VLC) details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or VideoLAN Client (VLC) better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while VideoLAN Client (VLC) is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and VideoLAN Client (VLC) free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and VideoLAN Client (VLC) under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and VideoLAN Client (VLC) with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. VideoLAN Client (VLC): check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons