PeerTube vs SyncTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeSyncTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptHaxe
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,236★ 383
First released20182020
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose SyncTube if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in Haxe
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
SyncTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or SyncTube better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while SyncTube is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and SyncTube free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SyncTube under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and SyncTube with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. SyncTube: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons