PeerTube vs Subsonic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeSubsonic
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0⊘ Proprietary
LanguageTypeScriptUnknown
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,236
First released20182020
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose Subsonic if…

  • Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
  • Written in Unknown
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Subsonic details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or Subsonic better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Subsonic is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and Subsonic free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Subsonic under ⊘ Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and Subsonic with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. Subsonic: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons