PeerTube vs Reaparr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeReaparr
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC#
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 15,236★ 680
First released20182026
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose Reaparr if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in C#
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Reaparr details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or Reaparr better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Reaparr is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and Reaparr free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Reaparr under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and Reaparr with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. Reaparr: yes.

Related comparisons