PeerTube vs Qui

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeQui
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,236★ 4,328
First released20182026
ReplacesYouTube, VimeoµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose Qui if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Qui details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or Qui better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Qui is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and Qui free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Qui under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and Qui with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. Qui: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons