PeerTube vs Profilarr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubeProfilarr
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0-only
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,236★ 2,515
First released20182024
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose Profilarr if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Profilarr details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or Profilarr better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Profilarr is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and Profilarr free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Profilarr under GPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and Profilarr with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. Profilarr: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons