PeerTube vs Polaris

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeerTubePolaris
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptRust
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,236★ 2,715
First released20182017
ReplacesYouTube, VimeoSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Choose Polaris if…

  • Low resource usage
  • Single binary deployment
Polaris details

Frequently asked questions

Is PeerTube or Polaris better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Polaris is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are PeerTube and Polaris free and open-source?

Yes. PeerTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Polaris under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PeerTube and Polaris with Docker?

PeerTube: yes. Polaris: yes.

Related comparisons