Peer-calls vs qTox

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePeer-callsqTox
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,903★ 4,977
First released20242014
ReplacesBigBlueButton, Skype, ZoomSkype, WhatsApp

Why pick each one

Choose Peer-calls if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
Peer-calls details

Choose qTox if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
qTox details

Frequently asked questions

Is Peer-calls or qTox better?

Neither is universally better. qTox has the larger community, while Peer-calls is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Peer-calls and qTox free and open-source?

Yes. Peer-calls is licensed under Apache-2.0 and qTox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Peer-calls and qTox with Docker?

Peer-calls: check the project docs for container support. qTox: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons