Passit vs Mozilla SOPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Passit
Self-hosted password manager with browser extensions
VS
Mozilla SOPS
Encrypt secrets in config files for version control
| Feature | Passit | Mozilla SOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 22,713 |
| First released | 2016 | 2015 |
| Replaces | LastPass, 1Password | AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Passit or Mozilla SOPS better?
Neither is universally better. Mozilla SOPS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Passit and Mozilla SOPS free and open-source?
Yes. Passit is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Mozilla SOPS under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Passit and Mozilla SOPS with Docker?
Passit: yes. Mozilla SOPS: check the project docs for container support.