pass vs pass-tomb

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurepasspass-tomb
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectRead-the-docs project
CategoryPassword ManagersPassword Managers
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageShellShell
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 4,200★ 437
First released20122017
Replaces1Password, LastPass1Password, KeePass

What are pass and pass-tomb?

pass

pass is a minimalist password manager that stores each secret in a GPG-encrypted file, optionally versioned with git. It follows the Unix philosophy and works entirely from the command line.

  • GPG-encrypted password files
  • Optional git versioning and sync
  • Scriptable command-line workflow
  • Many compatible GUI and mobile clients

Read the full pass guide →

pass-tomb

pass-tomb is an open-source extension for the standard Unix password manager that keeps the password store inside an encrypted Tomb container. It hides the directory structure of secrets when the store is locked.

  • Encrypted Tomb container
  • Hides store structure
  • Integrates with pass
  • Command-line workflow

pass vs pass-tomb: key differences

Both projects are written in Shell. Licensing differs — GPL-2.0 for pass versus GPL-3.0 for pass-tomb. Pass is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 64 MB for pass-tomb. Pass is the more established project (first released 2012), while pass-tomb arrived in 2017. Pass has the considerably larger community, at 4,200 GitHub stars versus 437.

Why pick each one

Choose pass if…

  • Simple and transparent storage
  • Composes well with other tools

Watch out for

  • Command-line oriented
  • Requires GPG knowledge
pass details

Choose pass-tomb if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Shell
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
pass-tomb details

Frequently asked questions

Is pass or pass-tomb better?

pass is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider pass-tomb if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are pass and pass-tomb free and open-source?

Yes. pass is licensed under GPL-2.0 and pass-tomb under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run pass and pass-tomb with Docker?

pass: check the project docs for container support. pass-tomb: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, pass or pass-tomb?

pass has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 64 MB for pass-tomb. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons