pass-tomb vs Mozilla SOPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
pass-tomb
Encrypted storage extension for the pass manager
VS
Mozilla SOPS
Encrypt secrets in config files for version control
| Feature | pass-tomb | Mozilla SOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Shell | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 435 | ★ 22,713 |
| First released | 2017 | 2015 |
| Replaces | 1Password, KeePass | AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault |
Why pick each one
Choose pass-tomb if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in Shell
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is pass-tomb or Mozilla SOPS better?
Mozilla SOPS is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider pass-tomb if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are pass-tomb and Mozilla SOPS free and open-source?
Yes. pass-tomb is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mozilla SOPS under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run pass-tomb and Mozilla SOPS with Docker?
pass-tomb: check the project docs for container support. Mozilla SOPS: check the project docs for container support.