pass-otp vs Browserpass

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurepass-otpBrowserpass
CategoryPassword ManagersPassword Managers
LicenseGPL-3.0ISC
LanguageShellJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 1,485★ 1,009
First released20172016
ReplacesAuthy, 1PasswordLastPass extension, 1Password extension

Why pick each one

Choose pass-otp if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
pass-otp details

Choose Browserpass if…

  • Released under the ISC license
  • Active community (1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Browserpass details

Frequently asked questions

Is pass-otp or Browserpass better?

Neither is universally better. pass-otp has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are pass-otp and Browserpass free and open-source?

Yes. pass-otp is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Browserpass under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run pass-otp and Browserpass with Docker?

pass-otp: check the project docs for container support. Browserpass: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons