2FAuth vs pass-otp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
2FAuth
Self-hosted web app to manage two-factor authentication codes
VS
pass-otp
One-time-password extension for the pass manager
| Feature | 2FAuth | pass-otp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Password Managers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,090 | ★ 1,485 |
| First released | 2020 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Authy, Google Authenticator | Authy, 1Password |
Why pick each one
Choose 2FAuth if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
Choose pass-otp if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Shell
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is 2FAuth or pass-otp better?
2FAuth is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider pass-otp if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are 2FAuth and pass-otp free and open-source?
Yes. 2FAuth is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pass-otp under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 2FAuth and pass-otp with Docker?
2FAuth: yes. pass-otp: check the project docs for container support.