pass-otp vs pass-tomb

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurepass-otppass-tomb
CategoryPassword ManagersPassword Managers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageShellShell
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 1,485★ 435
First released20172017
ReplacesAuthy, 1Password1Password, KeePass

Why pick each one

Choose pass-otp if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
pass-otp details

Choose pass-tomb if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Shell
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
pass-tomb details

Frequently asked questions

Is pass-otp or pass-tomb better?

pass-otp is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider pass-tomb if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are pass-otp and pass-tomb free and open-source?

Yes. pass-otp is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pass-tomb under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run pass-otp and pass-tomb with Docker?

pass-otp: check the project docs for container support. pass-tomb: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons