ParadeDB vs Quickwit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ParadeDB
Postgres extension for full-text and analytical search
VS
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
| Feature | ParadeDB | Quickwit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,135 | ★ 11,471 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch | Splunk, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Choose ParadeDB if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is ParadeDB or Quickwit better?
Neither is universally better. Quickwit has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are ParadeDB and Quickwit free and open-source?
Yes. ParadeDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Quickwit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ParadeDB and Quickwit with Docker?
ParadeDB: yes. Quickwit: yes.