Papercups vs Quicksy Bridge
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Papercups
Open-source live chat and customer messaging
VS
Quicksy Bridge
XMPP gateway providing phone-number based messaging
| Feature | Papercups | Quicksy Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Elixir | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,097 | ★ 3,000 |
| First released | 2020 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Intercom, Drift | WhatsApp, Signal |
Why pick each one
Choose Papercups if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Elixir
Frequently asked questions
Is Papercups or Quicksy Bridge better?
Papercups is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Quicksy Bridge if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Papercups and Quicksy Bridge free and open-source?
Yes. Papercups is licensed under MIT and Quicksy Bridge under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Papercups and Quicksy Bridge with Docker?
Papercups: yes. Quicksy Bridge: yes.