Papercups vs Peer-calls

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePapercupsPeer-calls
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageElixirGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 6,097★ 1,903
First released20202024
ReplacesIntercom, DriftBigBlueButton, Skype, Zoom

Why pick each one

Choose Papercups if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Elixir
Papercups details

Choose Peer-calls if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
Peer-calls details

Frequently asked questions

Is Papercups or Peer-calls better?

Neither is universally better. Papercups has the larger community, while Peer-calls is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Papercups and Peer-calls free and open-source?

Yes. Papercups is licensed under MIT and Peer-calls under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Papercups and Peer-calls with Docker?

Papercups: yes. Peer-calls: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons