Paisa vs Rotki
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Paisa
Personal finance manager on plain-text accounting
VS
Rotki
Privacy-focused portfolio and crypto accounting tool
| Feature | Paisa | Rotki |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Budgeting & Finance | Budgeting & Finance |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,190 | ★ 3,968 |
| First released | 2022 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Mint, Personal Capital | CoinTracker, Koinly |
Why pick each one
Choose Rotki if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Paisa or Rotki better?
Neither is universally better. Rotki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Paisa and Rotki free and open-source?
Yes. Paisa is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Rotki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Paisa and Rotki with Docker?
Paisa: yes. Rotki: yes.