OSRM vs wanderer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OSRM
High-performance routing engine for OpenStreetMap
VS
wanderer
Trail database where you can upload your recorded tracks or create new
| Feature | OSRM | wanderer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 8,192 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,955 | ★ 3,802 |
| First released | 2012 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Directions API | — |
Why pick each one
Choose OSRM if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 8k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
Choose wanderer if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is OSRM or wanderer better?
Neither is universally better. OSRM has the larger community, while wanderer is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are OSRM and wanderer free and open-source?
Yes. OSRM is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and wanderer under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OSRM and wanderer with Docker?
OSRM: yes. wanderer: yes.