GeoMoose vs OSRM
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GeoMoose
Web mapping framework for spatial applications
VS
OSRM
High-performance routing engine for OpenStreetMap
| Feature | GeoMoose | OSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | JavaScript | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 64 | ★ 7,955 |
| First released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Replaces | ArcGIS Online | Google Directions API |
Why pick each one
Choose GeoMoose if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose OSRM if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 8k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is GeoMoose or OSRM better?
Neither is universally better. OSRM has the larger community, while GeoMoose is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GeoMoose and OSRM free and open-source?
Yes. GeoMoose is licensed under MIT and OSRM under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GeoMoose and OSRM with Docker?
GeoMoose: check the project docs for container support. OSRM: yes.