SHSelfHostIndex

Dawarich vs GeoMoose

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DA Dawarich Self-hosted location history tracker and visualizer VS GE GeoMoose Web mapping framework for spatial applications
FeatureDawarichGeoMoose
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageRubyJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 10,036★ 64
First released20242009
ReplacesGoogle Maps TimelineArcGIS Online

Why pick each one

Choose Dawarich if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10k GitHub stars
  • Written in Ruby
Dawarich details

Choose GeoMoose if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
GeoMoose details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dawarich or GeoMoose better?

Neither is universally better. Dawarich has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Dawarich and GeoMoose free and open-source?

Yes. Dawarich is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and GeoMoose under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dawarich and GeoMoose with Docker?

Dawarich: yes. GeoMoose: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons