OSRM vs TRIP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OSRM
High-performance routing engine for OpenStreetMap
VS
TRIP
Minimalist POI Map tracker and Trip planner
| Feature | OSRM | TRIP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Language | C++ | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 8,192 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,955 | ★ 1,799 |
| First released | 2012 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Directions API | — |
Why pick each one
Choose OSRM if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 8k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
Choose TRIP if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is OSRM or TRIP better?
Neither is universally better. OSRM has the larger community, while TRIP is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are OSRM and TRIP free and open-source?
Yes. OSRM is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and TRIP under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OSRM and TRIP with Docker?
OSRM: yes. TRIP: yes.